首页> 外文OA文献 >The influence of platform switching on the biomechanical aspects of the implant-abutment system. A three dimensional finite element study
【2h】

The influence of platform switching on the biomechanical aspects of the implant-abutment system. A three dimensional finite element study

机译:平台切换对种植体-基台系统生物力学方面的影响。三维有限元研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective: To evaluate the biomechanical scenario of platform switching geometric implant-abutment configuration relative to standard configurations by means of finite element analysis.Study Design: A 3D Finite Element Analysis (FEA) was performed on 3 different implant-abutment configurations: a 3.8 mm implant with a matching diameter abutment (Standard Control Design, SCD), a 5.5 mm implant with matching diameter abutment (Wider Control Design, WCD), and a 5.5mm implant with a 3.8 mm abutment (Experimental Design, ED). All the different experimental groups were discretized to over 60000 elements and 100000 nodes, and 130N vertical (axial) and 90N horizontal loads were applied on the coronal portion of the abutment. Von Mises stresses were evaluated and maximum and minimum values were acquired for each implantabutment configuration. Results: The load-induced Von Mises stress (maximum to minumum ranges) on the implant ranged from 150 MPa to 58 Pa (SCD); 45 MPa to 55 Pa (WCD); 190 MPa to 64 Pa (ED). The Von Mises stress on the abutment ranged from 150 MPa to 52 MPa (SCD); 70 MPa to 55 MPa (WCD), and 85 MPa to 42 MPa respectively (ED). The maximum stresses transmitted from the implant-abutment system to the cortical and trabecular bone were 67 Pa and 52 MPa (SCD); 54 Pa and 27 MPa (WCD); 64 Pa and 42 MPa (ED), respectively. When the implant body was evaluated for stresses, a substantial decrease in their levels were observed at the threaded implant region due to the diametral mismatch between implant and abutment for the ED configuration. Conclusion: The platform switching configuration led to not only to a relative decrease in stress levels compared to narrow and wide standard configurations, but also to a notable stress field shift from bone towards the implant system, potentially resulting in lower crestal bone overloading. © Medicina Oral S. L.
机译:目的:通过有限元分析评估平台切换几何种植体-基台配置相对于标准配置的生物力学场景研究设计:对3种不同的种植体-基台配置进行了3D有限元分析(FEA):3.8毫米具有匹配直径基台的种植体(标准控制设计,SCD),具有匹配直径基台的5.5毫米种植体(Wider Control设计,WCD)和具有3.8毫米基台的5.5mm种植体(实验设计,ED)。将所有不同的实验组离散化为超过60000个元素和100000个节点,并在基台的冠状部分施加130N的垂直(轴向)载荷和90N的水平载荷。评估了冯·米塞斯(Von Mises)的应力,并获得了每种种植体基台配置的最大值和最小值。结果:植入物上的负载诱导的冯·米塞斯应力(最大至最小范围)为150 MPa至58 Pa(SCD)。 45 MPa至55 Pa(WCD); 190 MPa至64 Pa(ED)。基台上的冯·米塞斯应力为150 MPa至52 MPa(SCD); 70 MPa至55 MPa(WCD)和85 MPa至42 MPa(ED)。从种植体-基台系统传递到皮质和小梁骨的最大应力为67 Pa和52 MPa(SCD)。 54 Pa和27 MPa(WCD);分别为64 Pa和42 MPa(ED)。当评估植入物主体的应力时,由于ED构造,由于植入物和基台之间的直径不匹配,在螺纹植入物区域观察到其水平明显下降。结论:与狭窄和宽阔的标准配置相比,平台转换配置不仅导致应力水平相对降低,而且导致显着的应力场从骨骼向植入系统转移,从而可能导致较低的骨超负荷。 ©Medicina Oral S.L.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号